Over the past two decades, the law has gradually adapted to reflect the realities of cohabiting partners, blended households, same-sex parents, and families formed through IVF and adoption. Yet every so often, a case emerges that pushes the boundaries of legal interpretation, and a recent decision of the Court of Session has done precisely that.
Over the past two decades, the law has gradually adapted to reflect the realities of cohabiting partners, blended households, same-sex parents, and families formed through IVF and adoption. Yet every so often, a case emerges that pushes the boundaries of legal interpretation, and a recent decision of the Court of Session has done precisely that.
In what has been described as a legal first in Scotland, a separated pair were permitted to proceed with the adoption of a child as a couple, despite no longer being in a relationship. The ruling has prompted fresh debate about what it means to be a relevant couple under adoption legislation, and what this could mean for prospective adopters across the UK.
While the case arose north of the border, it raises important questions for families in England and Wales. Could a similar interpretation be applied here? And what does this development tell us about how the courts are approaching the concept of family in 2026?
The Scottish decision: A shift in perspective
Under Scottish law, couples may apply jointly to adopt provided they meet the statutory definition of a couple. Traditionally, this has implied that the individuals are in an enduring relationship at the time the adoption order is made. In the recent case before the Court of Session, however, the petitioners had separated after beginning the adoption journey but before the final order was granted.
Ordinarily, this change in circumstances might have derailed the application. Adoption is not simply about suitability at the beginning; the court must be satisfied that the order promotes the lifelong welfare of the child. And in adoption cases, stability is seen as paramount. Yet in this case, the court took a pragmatic and child-focused view.
The judges examined the substance of the relationship as it existed when the application was initiated and considered the ongoing cooperative parenting arrangement between the parties. Although no longer romantically involved, they continued to share parental responsibilities and intended to raise the child together.
In doing so, the court effectively broadened the interpretation of what amounts to a relevant couple, focusing less on romantic involvement and more on shared parental commitment.
Defining a relevant couple beyond romance
The term relevant couple is not new to Scottish adoption law. It appears in statutory provisions that permit joint applications by married couples, civil partners, and certain cohabitants. What is new is the court’s willingness to interpret the concept flexibly in light of modern circumstances.
At its heart, the judgment acknowledges a reality familiar to many lawyers: relationships change, couples separate, and family structures evolve. Yet parenting responsibilities do not simply evaporate because a partnership ends.
The court was careful to stress that its decision turned on the specific facts. The pair had embarked upon the adoption journey together, had been approved jointly, and had demonstrated a continued ability to cooperate in the child’s upbringing. There was no suggestion of conflict or instability that would undermine the child’s welfare.
This nuanced approach aligns with the broader path of family law, which increasingly prioritises function over form. The question is not whether the adults fit a traditional mould, but whether they can provide a secure and nurturing home.
Adoption rights and adoption processes in modern families
For those considering expanding their families through adoption, the ruling invites reflection on how adoption rights operate in practice. In Scotland, the legal framework aims to ensure that children who cannot remain with their birth families are placed in stable, permanent homes. Joint applications by couples have long been encouraged where appropriate, as they may offer a broader support network.
However, adoption processes are rigorous, with prospective adopters undergoing detailed assessments, background checks, and preparation training. Approval is only the first stage, with the court retaining ultimate oversight before granting an adoption order.
The recent case does not dismantle these safeguards. Rather, it illustrates that the courts are prepared to interpret legislation purposively where doing so serves the child’s best interests. It may offer reassurance to some applicants who experience relationship changes during what can be a lengthy and emotionally demanding process.
Implications for Scotland’s prospective adopters
For families in Scotland, the decision signals a measure of flexibility. Adoption agencies and local authorities may need to consider how they advise applicants whose circumstances change mid-process.
It is conceivable that more separated pairs might seek to rely on this precedent where they can demonstrate a stable co-parenting arrangement. Equally, agencies may approach such situations cautiously, mindful that conflict between former partners could complicate matters significantly.
The key takeaway is that the label of a relevant couple may not be confined strictly to those in an ongoing romantic relationship. Instead, the emphasis is placed on a shared intention and capacity to parent together.
That said, no two cases are the same. Where acrimony, geographical distance, or inconsistent parenting approaches exist, a court may well reach a different conclusion.
Could England and Wales follow suit?
Although family law differs between jurisdictions, courts in England and Wales are also guided by the paramountcy principle, namely that the child’s welfare is the court’s overriding consideration.
Under the Adoption and Children Act 2002, joint applications may be made by married couples, civil partners, or two people living as partners in an enduring family relationship. As matters stand, separation before the making of an adoption order would likely present significant hurdles.
However, the Scottish ruling may prove persuasive rather than binding. Courts in England and Wales occasionally look to developments elsewhere in the UK when grappling with unusual issues. Should a similar factual scenario arise, judges may be invited to consider whether an interpretation of the Scottish case better reflects the realities of contemporary family life.
The broader context: Law catching up with life
The concept of family has expanded dramatically in recent decades. Same-sex marriage, surrogacy arrangements, step-parent adoption, and increasing recognition of cohabiting partners have all reshaped the legal landscape.
Against this backdrop, the idea that two people might parent together despite no longer being romantically involved is hardly radical. Many separated parents successfully co-parent biological children. Because adoption severs the legal ties with the birth family and creates a new, permanent status, the court must be confident that the adoption is robust.
By interpreting relevant couple in a way that centres on practical parenting rather than romantic status, the Scottish court has arguably aligned adoption law more closely with the lived experience of modern families. Not every household fits the traditional nuclear model, yet many provide loving and stable environments.
Find The Best Divorce & Family Lawyers Near You
We independently review and list the top divorce lawyers and family solicitors in the towns and cities near you. 100% free.
The information on this website is to be considered a guide and is therefore not legal advice. You use this information with the understanding that Wiselaw does not accept liability for any direct or indirect losses as a result of anyone relying on or acting upon the information on this website. Whilst we endeavour to provide accurate information, Wiselaw does not accept liability for any errors or omissions on this website.
