Divorce is a challenging and often emotionally charged process that can vary greatly depending on the couple’s approach. Depending on the amicability of the split, divorcing couples responses can include a wide spectrum of tactics. Here, we explore the most common strategies used in divorce proceedings, outlining the implications of each.
Divorce is a challenging and often emotionally charged process that can vary greatly depending on the couple’s approach. Depending on the amicability of the split, divorcing couples responses can include a wide spectrum of tactics. Here, we explore the most common strategies used in divorce proceedings, outlining the implications of each.
If you have a family law issue and you require legal advice to understand your options, contact specialist family law solicitor Naheed Taj. Naheed is a highly acclaimed family solicitor with a successful track record in dealing with complex and challenging family law, divorce, and child cases.
Amicable and constructive divorce
An amicable approach prioritises cooperation and open communication, with both parties seeking to end their marriage respectfully. This often involves mediation or collaborative law, where both parties work with legal professionals to negotiate a settlement without going to court.
Advantages include:
- It is cost-effective meaning less time is spent in court and fewer legal fees are incurred
- Generally faster than contested divorces
- There is a reduced emotional toll which is less confrontational. This helps both parties and any children adjust more smoothly.
- Often leads to healthier co-parenting and post-divorce relationships which result in better long-term relationships.
Disadvantages include:
- It requires both parties’ cooperation. If one party becomes uncooperative or unreasonable, an amicable approach may break down.
- If one spouse is significantly more financially or emotionally powerful, they may influence the other to settle for less than they’re entitled to.
Combative divorce
A combative or adversarial approach is when one or both parties aggressively pursue their interests, often resorting to court to resolve disputes. This approach may involve court proceedings over issues surrounding property division, child arrangements, and spousal support. It should be made clear that the process is designed to encourage working together and reaching a settlement even where court applications have been made. A solicitor will always try to promote and negotiate a settlement.
Advantages include:
- Can help protect an individual’s financial and parental rights, particularly if the other party is being unreasonable.
- Court involvement means where the parties cannot agree, a judge will make binding decisions, which can be beneficial when parties are at an impasse.
Disadvantages include:
- Court battles are costly and, in some cases, can drag on for years.
- Often involves high stress and emotional strain, affecting both spouses and any children.
- Can damage co-parenting dynamics and make post-divorce interactions hostile.
Hiding assets
In an attempt to minimise the matrimonial assets subject to division, one spouse may hide or under-report assets, such as moving funds to secret accounts or undervaluing property or investments. If someone is found to have hidden assets, they may be subject to court sanctions which can be severe.
Disadvantages include:
- It is illegal and unethical. Hiding assets is considered fraud, which can lead to legal repercussions, including fines and loss of credibility in court.
- If discovered, hidden assets can be claimed back in the settlement, and the offending party may receive a smaller share.
- Such deception can negatively impact children if it leads to financial instability or a loss of trust between parents.
Hiring a good solicitor
Divorcing parties often seek highly experienced, reputable solicitors to represent them, believing that a top-tier lawyer will secure a favourable outcome.
Advantages include:
- A skilled solicitor can navigate complex legal issues and negotiate favourable terms
- Experienced solicitors understand can anticipate the other sides strategies
- A knowledgeable solicitor can help secure a fairer distribution of assets or custody arrangements.
Disadvantages include:
- Top solicitors can be very expensive, increasing legal costs significantly.
- Overly aggressive representation can complicate issues that might have been resolved amicably.
Using financial disparities to outspend the other party
In some cases, a wealthier spouse may try to exhaust the other party’s financial resources by prolonging the legal process, hoping to coerce them into a more favourable settlement.
Advantages include:
- If successful, this tactic may force the other party to settle for less.
- The wealthier spouse may feel more in control of the proceedings.
Disadvantages include:
- This can be perceived as harassment, which may not be looked upon favourably by the court.
- Lengthy legal battles result in higher legal fees, sometimes draining finances unnecessarily.
- Prolonged conflict harms both parties, particularly if children are involved.
Lying or exaggerating claims
Some individuals lie or exaggerate claims, perhaps alleging abuse, to sway the court in their favour regarding child arrangements or financial decisions. Although false claims, if believed, may lead to a better outcome for the dishonest party, a solicitor would never knowingly mislead the court, and can be disciplined by the Solicitors Regulation Authority if they do so.
Disadvantages include:
- The court takes false claims seriously; if lies are exposed, it may damage the credibility of the dishonest party.
- False statements under oath can lead to perjury charges and fines.
- Dishonest claims damage familial relationships, often alienating children or extended family.
Emotional blackmail or psychological manipulation
Emotional manipulation can include guilt-tripping, using children as leverage, or attempting to pressure the other spouse emotionally to gain an advantage in settlements or custody arrangements.
Disadvantages include:
- Prolonged manipulation can take a serious toll on the mental health of all involved, particularly children.
- Courts and solicitors are increasingly aware of manipulative tactics, which can backfire if identified.
Rushing the divorce process
Some individuals try to speed up divorce proceedings by rushing the financial settlement, either to remarry quickly or because they feel confident they will secure a favourable outcome.
Advantages include:
- A quick divorce can allow both parties to move on sooner.
- Shorter proceedings mean fewer solicitor fees.
Disadvantages include:
- Rushing may lead to overlooking assets or inadequate financial arrangements.
- Some may rush to divorce before fully processing their emotions, which can lead to regret.
Collaborative law and mediation
Collaborative law involves both parties working together with their solicitors in structured sessions, often with a mediator, to reach an agreement without court involvement.
Advantages include:
- Reduces legal fees and avoids court
- Both parties have more say in the final agreement
- This approach is less adversarial, promoting healthy post-divorce relationships
Disadvantages include:
- If either party becomes uncooperative, the collaborative process can break down.
- Mediation may not be ideal when significant assets or custody issues are contested.
Generally, the court encourages less combative methods like mediation, recognising the long-term benefits for families, particularly when children are involved. Understanding these options and their implications can help divorcing couples make informed choices that protect their legal rights and, ideally, maintain a foundation for future co-parenting or peaceful communication post-divorce.
Find The Best Divorce & Family Lawyers Near You
We independently review and list the top divorce lawyers and family solicitors in the towns and cities near you. 100% free.
The information on this website is to be considered a guide and is therefore not legal advice. You use this information with the understanding that Wiselaw does not accept liability for any direct or indirect losses as a result of anyone relying on or acting upon the information on this website. Whilst we endeavour to provide accurate information, Wiselaw does not accept liability for any errors or omissions on this website.
