A difficult divorce is not necessarily one involving enormous wealth, overseas property or a lengthy court hearing, and may instead be a separation in which one spouse feels unable to accept that the marriage has ended, where communication has broken down or where each person has a very different understanding of what would represent a fair outcome. Difficulty depends upon the personalities, history, resources, and vulnerabilities within the family.
A difficult divorce is not necessarily one involving enormous wealth, overseas property or a lengthy court hearing, and may instead be a separation in which one spouse feels unable to accept that the marriage has ended, where communication has broken down or where each person has a very different understanding of what would represent a fair outcome. Difficulty depends upon the personalities, history, resources, and vulnerabilities within the family.
The divorce itself may be the simplest part
Although the no-fault divorce procedure has reduced the scope for arguments about blame within the divorce application, it has not removed conflict from separation generally. The legal ending of the marriage is distinct from arrangements concerning children and finances; therefore the final divorce order does not automatically divide property, sever financial claims or decide where the children should live.
This can surprise separating couples, as they may expect one process to deal with everything, only to discover that the divorce, financial settlement, and child arrangements are separate legal issues. Consequently, a couple might complete the divorce application without disagreement while continuing to negotiate their finances for many months.
What makes a difficult divorce?
The answer will differ from one relationship or family to another. Legal complexity can certainly create challenges; for example, a case may involve a family business, inherited wealth, trusts, overseas investments, substantial pensions or uncertainty over the true value of assets. Expert evidence may be needed, and the tax consequences of different settlement options may require careful consideration.
However, technically complicated cases are not always the most hostile. If both spouses provide full disclosure, obtain sensible advice, and accept that neither will secure everything they want, even substantial financial arrangements can sometimes be resolved constructively.
By contrast, a family with one home, two ordinary incomes and modest savings may experience persistent conflict. One spouse might refuse to provide bank statements or respond to correspondence; they may dispute the value of the home despite clear professional evidence, or reject proposals without offering any workable alternative.
Difficulty may also arise because one person is frightened about the future. A spouse who has relied financially on the other for many years may worry about paying household expenses, securing a mortgage, or returning to work. The higher earner may be anxious about supporting two homes or rebuilding their own financial position, and these concerns can cause both people to adopt defensive positions, even when there is no deliberate attempt to be obstructive.
Emotional readiness is rarely equal
The person who ends a marriage has often been thinking about separation for months or even years. They may have privately considered the financial consequences, imagined living elsewhere, and begun adjusting emotionally to the idea of a different future. In these circumstances, when they eventually announce the decision, they are probably ready to move quickly.
The other spouse may hear the news for the first time and are then expected to discuss selling the family home, dividing pensions and arranging time with the children while still trying to understand why the relationship has ended.
This imbalance can create considerable tension; one spouse may see delay and indecision, while the other is experiencing shock and grief. Requests for space may be interpreted as obstruction, and attempts to resolve matters promptly may feel insensitive or intimidating.
The circumstances surrounding the separation also matter. For example, an affair, financial deception, or an unexpected departure from the family home can destroy trust at precisely the point when both spouses need to exchange information and make important decisions. Even an apparently reasonable proposal may be viewed with suspicion if it comes from someone who is believed to have been dishonest during the marriage.
When money represents more than money
The family home may be the most valuable asset within the marriage, but it can also represent stability, identity, and security. A spouse who wants to retain it may be trying to protect the children from further change rather than simply seeking a greater share of the matrimonial assets.
The other spouse may need the property to be sold so that both parties can rehouse themselves and that continued ownership by their former partner leaves them carrying mortgage liabilities or prevents them from moving forward. Neither position is inherently unreasonable, but the available resources may not be sufficient to satisfy both.
Children can become the focus of conflict
For many parents, uncertainty about future arrangements for the children is more distressing than any disagreement over money. Both may genuinely believe they know what is best, but their ideas of stability and fairness may be very different.
One parent may want the children to spend broadly equal time in each household. The other may believe that frequent movement would be disruptive, particularly during the school week. Work patterns, travel distances, the children’s ages, and any additional needs will all affect what is practical.
There is no automatic legal rule requiring an equal division of time, and if the court is asked to determine arrangements, the welfare of the child is its paramount consideration. Problems sometimes intensify because discussions about the children become entangled with financial negotiations. A parent may feel that time with the children is being used as leverage, or that disagreements over money are influencing decisions about contact. Keeping these issues separate can help prevent an already painful situation from becoming more confrontational.
Conduct can change the entire experience
Some cases are challenging because one spouse appears determined to frustrate the process. They may fail to disclose assets, transfer money, incur unexplained debts or repeatedly ignore correspondence, while others bombard their former partner with messages, make threats or continue patterns of coercive and controlling behaviour after separation.
Domestic abuse is not limited to physical violence and can include emotional, psychological, sexual or economic abuse, as well as controlling or coercive behaviour. A spouse may restrict access to money, monitor communications, interfere with employment, or use threats concerning the home or children to maintain control.
Why other people’s divorce stories can mislead
Friends and relatives often want to help, but their accounts can create unrealistic expectations. Someone may say they received half of everything without explaining that the pension was offset against the family home, and another may claim that their former spouse was forced to pay all their legal costs, when that outcome may have resulted from highly unusual conduct.
Small factual differences can produce very different results; a settlement suitable after a five-year marriage between two independently employed spouses may be inappropriate following a 30-year marriage in which one person gave up their career to care for the family. The presence of young children, health conditions, inherited property, or limited mortgage capacity can alter what is fair and achievable.
Online discussions also tend to present one person’s version of events and may omit the negotiations, evidence, or judicial reasoning behind an outcome. Family law is highly fact-sensitive, so reliable advice must be based on the actual circumstances rather than comparisons with another person’s settlement.
Ultimately, a difficult divorce is not defined by a court form or a particular level of financial wealth; rather, it is defined by the effect the separation has on the individuals and family involved. With clear advice, realistic expectations, and an approach suited to the particular circumstances, even a demanding case can move forwards productively.
Find The Best Divorce & Family Lawyers Near You
We independently review and list the top divorce lawyers and family solicitors in the towns and cities near you. 100% free.
The information on this website is to be considered a guide and is therefore not legal advice. You use this information with the understanding that Wiselaw does not accept liability for any direct or indirect losses as a result of anyone relying on or acting upon the information on this website. Whilst we endeavour to provide accurate information, Wiselaw does not accept liability for any errors or omissions on this website.
