Under the family mediation voucher scheme, eligible families can receive a contribution of up to £500 towards mediation concerning arrangements for children. The money is not a loan and is intended to make mediation more accessible while reducing the number of private family disputes entering an already stretched court system.
The continuation of funding does not mean that mediation will be suitable for every separating family or that £500 will necessarily cover the entire process. Nevertheless, it can remove an important financial obstacle at a time when both households may be adjusting to increased living costs, new housing arrangements, and the expense of obtaining legal advice.
Why the scheme has been extended
The scheme was introduced in 2021 as part of an effort to encourage more separating families to resolve disagreements outside the family court. Early analysis of the first 7,200 families using the scheme found that more than two-thirds reached a full or partial agreement without needing to go to court.
The extension is particularly significant because mediation costs can discourage parents who do not qualify for legal aid but have little disposable income. A household may appear financially secure on paper while at the same time struggling with rent, mortgage payments, childcare expenses, and the cost of running two homes after separation. A contribution towards mediation can make the difference between exploring an agreement and moving immediately towards litigation.
How the family mediation voucher scheme works
The process begins by contacting a family mediator participating in the scheme, who will normally arrange a Mediation Information and Assessment Meeting, often known as a MIAM, to explain the process and consider whether mediation is appropriate.
During the assessment, the mediator will speak to each participant about the background to the dispute. This includes exploring whether there has been domestic abuse, coercive or controlling behaviour, intimidation, substance misuse or any other concern that could make mediation unsafe. The mediator must also consider whether both people can negotiate freely and whether appropriate safeguards could allow the process to continue.
If the case is suitable and meets the eligibility requirements, the mediator can discuss the availability of a voucher and obtain the necessary consent. The contribution is paid towards the cost of mediation rather than being handed to either party as cash. It is available once per family or case and cannot normally be claimed separately by each participant.
A voucher may contribute up to £500, although the total cost of mediation can be higher. The amount required will depend upon the mediator’s charges, the complexity of the dispute, and the number of sessions needed.
The voucher does not ordinarily pay for the MIAM itself, cover each party’s independent legal advice, or the preparation of a legally binding court order. These distinctions are important because parents can otherwise begin the process expecting every associated expense to be met.
Disputes that may qualify for support
The scheme is principally aimed at disputes involving children. A common example is a disagreement about where children should live following separation and how much time they should spend with each parent. Mediation may also address school holidays, special occasions, overseas travel, communication between visits, and the practical arrangements for collecting or returning a child.
Financial matters may sometimes be considered alongside arrangements for children. For example, parents discussing the children’s living arrangements may also need to address who will pay nursery fees or how they will divide the cost of school trips. However, a dispute dealing only with the division of property, pensions or other matrimonial finances will not generally qualify for a voucher.
The role of legal advice alongside mediation
A mediator can provide neutral legal information but cannot advise one parent about whether a proposed outcome is in their personal interests. Independent advice can therefore be valuable before an agreement is finalised.
An understanding reached in mediation is not automatically enforceable in the same way as a court order. If the parents want legal certainty, a solicitor can advise whether the terms should be recorded in a consent order and submitted to the court for approval.
In children cases, the court follows a general principle that it should not make an order unless doing so would be better for the child than making no order. Some parents may therefore decide that a detailed parenting plan is sufficient, while others may need an enforceable order because of the history of the dispute.
When mediation may not be appropriate
The availability of the family mediation voucher scheme does not override safety concerns. Where there has been domestic abuse, a serious imbalance of power or a risk that one parent cannot participate freely, ordinary mediation may be unsuitable. The assessment process is intended to identify those concerns before joint discussions begin.
Some survivors of domestic abuse may wish to mediate with safeguards such as separate meetings, remote attendance, and no direct contact. Others will reasonably decide that the process would be unsafe or unfair. The mediator will consider the particular circumstances of the case rather than treating mediation as a compulsory step to be taken.
There are also disputes in which mediation is safe but unlikely to be productive, including where one parent refuses to provide information, repeatedly changes their position or attends only to delay proceedings. In these circumstances, continuing with sessions may be considered a waste of limited public funds. Here, the mediator can end the process and provide the documentation that may be required to make a court application.
Making constructive use of the voucher
Parents are more likely to benefit from mediation if they prepare carefully and approach the process with a clear understanding of the decisions that need to be made. It can help to identify the practical issues affecting the child’s week, including:
- School times
- Extra-curricular activities
- Childcare
- Travel
- Each parent’s employment commitments.
Long arguments about past behaviour may consume time without helping to determine future arrangements. This does not mean that relevant conduct must be ignored, but those issues should be separated from grievances that do not need to govern the child’s future relationship with either parent.
Parents should also avoid treating the £500 contribution as a reason to rush into an agreement. A proposal affecting where a child lives or how family finances are organised deserves careful consideration. Mediation should support informed decisions, not create pressure to settle before the available funding is exhausted.
Find The Best Divorce & Family Lawyers Near You
We independently review and list the top divorce lawyers and family solicitors in the towns and cities near you. 100% free.
The information on this website is to be considered a guide and is therefore not legal advice. You use this information with the understanding that Wiselaw does not accept liability for any direct or indirect losses as a result of anyone relying on or acting upon the information on this website. Whilst we endeavour to provide accurate information, Wiselaw does not accept liability for any errors or omissions on this website.
