What Is Coercive Control And What Can You Do About It?

In England and Wales, it is a criminal offence to subject another to coercive control. But what amounts to such behaviour and how do you know it is happening? Most importantly, what can you do about it? This article sets out how the law can protect you.


Such behaviour can be subtle and cunning. An abuser is a skilled manipulator and will lie their way out of any situation, making you believe you are in the wrong. They may even force you to admit this. Such behaviour is systematic and a classic sign of gaslighting.

What counts as coercive control?

Forms of coercive control include but are not limited to:

  • Constantly putting you down and name calling
  • Controlling you financially – taking your money or making you account for everything you spend
  • Punching walls, breaking your belongings
  • Threatening to harm you and/or the children
  • Threatening to commit suicide
  • Controlling when/where you sleep and what you eat
  • Begging and crying for forgiveness
  • Telling you it will never happen again

This is by no means an exhaustive list and can never be so because an abuser will often tailor their behaviour to their victim. Consequently, conduct can vary greatly from one relationship to another.

What the law says about coercive control

In December 2015, the Serious Crime Act created an offence of controlling or coercive behaviour in family or intimate relationships. Patterns of such behaviour tend to be well established even before a first incident is reported.

It is common for an abuser to make or threaten to make bogus allegations about their victims to social services, the police, and other authorities. These threats are part of their controlling and coercive behaviour, which you can also report to the police.

The police will only prosecute an abuser for coercive control if the behaviour being complained about happens on at least two separate occasions. There must also be evidence that the victim feared violence will be used against them, or they suffered serious distress or alarm affecting their day-to-day life.

Only someone who is ‘personally connected’ to you can commit the offence of coercive control. The law considers that you are personally connected to your abuser if you are in an ‘intimate relationship’ with them. This could be your spouse, partner, or someone you have a romantic connection to and includes same-sex relationships. You can also be personally connected to someone if they are a member of your family, such as an adult child or anyone else you are related to. It can also include someone your spouse or partner is related to and that you live with, their parents, for example.

Offenders found guilty of coercive and controlling behaviour may receive a community order, but for more serious offences, they could face five years’ imprisonment.

What evidence do you need to prove coercive control?

Statutory guidance sets out a non-exhaustive list of the sort of evidence that might prove whether coercive control took place. Things such as:

  • Emails
  • Phone records
  • Voicemail and text messages
  • Photographs of injuries
  • Body worn footage (police)
  • Medical records
  • Bank statements
  • Victim’s diary
  • Witness testimony (neighbours, GP)
  • GPS tracking apps or devices installed on mobile phones or vehicles

The real issue around prosecution surrounds the ‘burden of proof’. This is a legal hurdle that must be overcome to prove to the court that the behaviour being complained about actually happened. There are two standards: one for the civil courts (the balance of probabilities) and a higher one for the criminal courts (beyond reasonable doubt). Domestic abuse has the ability to straddle both courts. If the victim is seeking an injunction in the family court, then it is a civil matter. And if the abuser has been charged by police with an offence, then it is a criminal matter.

Proving coercive control to a criminal court can be a herculean task, with hard-pressed and over-worked police officers often failing to put together sufficient evidence to overcome the burden of proof hurdle. The onus therefore tends to fall to the victim to provide the police with the evidence they require, although for those forced to flee their home, this may be easier said than done.

If you are helping the police gather evidence, consider your safety and that of any children first. Although it is perfectly understandable you would want to help secure a conviction, remember, it is the job of the police to investigate and they should not expect you to do anything that puts you in danger.

Where to go to for help

If you have been the victim of coercive control and there is an emergency, you should call the police on 999. For non-emergency cases, you should dial 101.

National domestic abuse organisations include:

Building a persuasive case

Unlike visible injuries or physical assault, coercive control can be subtle and spread over long periods. As such, gathering proof is about documenting patterns — not necessarily individual events.

Here are key types of evidence you should prepare:

1. Personal diary or incident log

Maintaining a written log of incidents can be one of the most powerful tools. This should include:

  • Date and time

  • Description of what happened

  • Emotional impact or physical symptoms (e.g., panic attacks, insomnia)

  • Any effects on children or daily functioning

Consistency and detail help illustrate a pattern of control over time — which is critical when determining how to prove coercive control in court.

2. Electronic communications

Messages that show constant checking, threatening language, silent treatment, or manipulation should be saved. This includes:

  • Texts and WhatsApp chats

  • Emails

  • Social media messages or posts

  • Call logs or voice notes

Screenshots should include date and time stamps. It is advisable to back these up in cloud storage or with your solicitor.

3. Financial control evidence

Economic abuse is a common tactic in coercive relationships. Bank statements, records of restricted access to money, or coerced spending can help when proving coercive control. Signs may include:

  • Victim being given an allowance

  • Blocked access to personal or joint accounts

  • Forced debt or denied use of credit

The more specific and quantifiable the evidence, the more persuasive it becomes.

4. Third-party statements

Witnesses, even if they only observed part of the behaviour, add credibility. These may include:

  • Family or friends

  • Healthcare professionals

  • Teachers (if children are affected)

  • Neighbours or support workers

Statements can be signed and submitted as written testimony and tested during hearings.

5. Professional assessments

A domestic abuse advocate, psychologist, GP, or therapist may provide written reports explaining the emotional impact and long-term harm of coercive control. Medical records showing stress-related illnesses also serve as evidence.

Children and coercive control: Risk and welfare

When coercive control is present in a household, its effects on children are often profound. The court is required to prioritise the child’s welfare above all else, and witnessing one parent exerting dominance over another is a recognised form of emotional harm.

Coercive parents often attempt to control or alienate the child against the other parent. In family court, this may lead to:

  • Supervised contact orders

  • Temporary or permanent cessation of contact

  • Instructions for child therapy or family intervention

This makes proving coercive control essential to protecting not only the victim but also their children.

Shaping the approach to coercive control

Legal precedents continue to refine how coercive control is viewed within family law. In Re H-N and Others (Children) [2021] EWCA Civ 44, the Court of Appeal emphasised that family courts must assess patterns of behaviour, not isolated incidents. It marked a turning point in recognising coercive control as a critical factor in child arrangements.

The court urged judges to focus less on criminal-style cross-examinations and more on the overarching abuse dynamics, shifting attention from physical to emotional and psychological harm.

In F v M [2021] EWFC 4, the court described coercive control as “a relentless campaign of subjugation.” The abuser’s manipulation extended into the court proceedings themselves, attempting to control the narrative. Justice Hayden used the phrase “coercive matrix” to describe the subtle yet destructive nature of the behaviour.

This case is often cited in legal arguments concerning how to prove coercive control when there is no “smoking gun” evidence.

In the most recent case of Re M (Children: Coercive Control) [2022] EWFC 26, the judge refused unsupervised contact between the father and children, despite no physical abuse being proven. The judgment acknowledged emotional degradation, control over finances, and alienation from family as reasons for court intervention.

Beyond the courtroom: Protective orders and practical steps

Victims of coercive control can pursue civil protections even if they do not initiate criminal proceedings. These include:

  • Non-molestation orders: Preventing the abuser from contacting the victim or coming near their home. Breach is a criminal offence.
  • Occupation orders: Determining who can remain in or return to the family home, especially important in cases involving children or joint tenancy.
  • Prohibited steps orders: Stopping a parent from making certain decisions or taking actions (like removing children from school or the country).

Preparing emotionally and practically for court

The process of proving coercive control can be emotionally taxing. Here are additional tips for preparing:

  • Work with a solicitor who has experience in abuse cases

  • Attend court with an advocate or support person

  • Seek counselling or trauma-informed support

  • Familiarise yourself with court processes in advance

While legal systems are improving in recognising non-physical abuse, victims still carry the burden of proving harm — making preparation critical.

Final thoughts

The legal landscape for survivors of emotional abuse is evolving. With the right tools, it is entirely possible to show the court the truth about your experience — even without visible scars. Documented patterns of behaviour, digital evidence, witness accounts, and medical testimony all contribute to proving coercive control.

Understanding how to prove coercive control empowers victims to assert their rights and protect their children. It also helps legal professionals, judges, and guardians focus on safety, fairness, and long-term wellbeing.

If you or someone you know is in a controlling relationship, seek legal guidance and professional support. You are not alone — and help is available.


Noticed an error on this page or something broken? If so, please email us at support[at]wiselaw.co.uk.

The information on this website is to be considered a guide and is therefore not legal advice. You use this information with the understanding that Wiselaw does not accept liability for any direct or indirect losses as a result of anyone relying on or acting upon the information on this website. Whilst we endeavour to provide accurate information, Wiselaw does not accept liability for any errors or omissions on this website.